DataAIHub
DataAIHubNews · Research · Tools · Learning
Holisticholisticevaluationtransparencyllm

HELM

Holistic Evaluation of Language Models (Stanford CRFM): multi-metric, multi-scenario evaluation emphasizing transparency and taxonomy of use cases.

Last reviewed: 23 July 2026

What it measures

Broad model behavior: accuracy, calibration, robustness, fairness, bias, toxicity, and efficiency across scenarios — not a single score.

Input / Output

Input: many scenario datasets (QA, info retrieval, toxicity, etc.). Output: per-metric reports and scenario dashboards.

Evaluation methodology

Standardized scenarios + metrics with published runs. Emphasizes documenting assumptions and limitations alongside numbers.

Metadata

Task
Holistic multi-metric evaluation
Domain
Cross-scenario LLM behavior
Modality
Text
Input type
Scenario-specific prompts
Output type
Scenario responses + metric suite
Evaluation type
Multi-metric automatic + taxonomy
Primary metric
Scenario-dependent (multi-metric)
Secondary metrics
Calibration, Robustness, Fairness, Toxicity, Efficiency
Paper
Holistic Evaluation of Language Models
GitHub
stanford-crfm/helm
Dataset
HELM scenarios
Leaderboard
Official live leaderboard (external)

Live leaderboard

Rankings change as new evaluations are published. View current results on the official leaderboard.

View live leaderboard →

Datasets

GitHub repositories

Related research

Related guides

Related tools

Related models

Companies

Related rankings

Explore more benchmarks

All benchmarks →