AnthropicProprietaryReasoningCodingMultimodal

Claude Opus

Anthropic’s high-stakes widely released Claude for hard agentic work; Fable 5.1 sits above it for peak capability.

Anthropic’s Claude Opus 5 tier for complex agentic coding, enterprise work, long-context analysis, and careful instruction following. Claude Fable 5.1 sits above Opus for peak widely released capability.

Why Claude Opus matters

Opus is what teams pick when instruction following, long-context synthesis, and careful agentic coding matter more than raw price. Fable 5.1 is the public capability ceiling; Opus remains the usual escalation off Sonnet for high-stakes enterprise and verification-heavy loops.

Vision · Tool calling · Thinking · MCP · Coding

Last reviewed: 2 September 2026

Official pricing →

When to choose Claude Opus

Decision guidance for architects—not a feature list.

Best for

  • Long-document analysis
  • Agentic coding with verification
  • High-stakes writing and policy
  • Research assistants with tools

Avoid if

  • You need the cheapest Claude tier for high-volume chat
  • Open weights or audio-first multimodal are requirements

Strengths

Qualitative snapshot for architects—not a public ranking.

  • Instruction following★★★★★
  • Agentic coding★★★★★
  • Long context★★★★★
  • Cost efficiency★★☆☆☆
  • Open weights☆☆☆☆

Ecosystem

Built by

  • Anthropic

    Opus is Anthropic’s top widely released Claude capability tier.

Competes with

  • GPT-5

    Primary closed-model rival for coding agents and enterprise assistants.

Works with

  • Cursor

    Frequently selected for careful, repo-aware coding in IDEs.

  • LangGraph

    Strong instruction following for durable multi-step agent graphs.

Recommended for

  • AI Agents

    Preferred when agent reliability and verification loops matter most.

Often paired with

  • Claude Sonnet

    Teams often route hard tasks to Opus and everyday production traffic to Sonnet.

How Claude Opus evolved

Key moments in chronological order.

  1. API

    Computer use GA + browser use

    Computer use is generally available as computer_toolset_20260801; browser_toolset_20260801 adds viewport/accessibility-tree control. Supported on Opus 5 (and peer Claude tiers).

  2. Model

    Claude Opus 5 GA

    Opus 5 ships as Anthropic’s everyday high-capability tier for agentic coding and 1M context at the same API rates as Opus 4.8.

  3. Product

    1M-token context class

    Document-heavy analysis and long agent threads become practical.

  4. Platform

    MCP support expands

    Model Context Protocol tooling broadens Claude’s agent integration surface.

  5. Product

    Computer-use style workflows

    UI and tool-driven agent patterns push Claude into operational automation.

  6. Model

    Claude 3 Opus launches

    Establishes Opus as Anthropic’s peak-capability brand in the Claude family.

Overview

Anthropic’s Claude Opus 5 tier for complex agentic coding, enterprise work, long-context analysis, and careful instruction following. Claude Fable 5.1 sits above Opus for peak widely released capability.

Capabilities

  • Vision: Yes
  • Audio: No
  • Tool calling: Yes
  • Thinking: Yes
  • MCP: Yes
  • Coding: Yes
  • Structured output: Yes

Technical specifications

Provider
Anthropic
License
Proprietary
Context window
1M
Parameters
Undisclosed
Architecture
Transformer (proprietary)
Release
2026-07
Modalities
Text, Image
Vision
Yes
Audio
No
Tool calling
Yes
Thinking
Yes
MCP
Yes
Open weights
No
API
Yes
Pricing (input)
~$5 per 1M tokens (claude-opus-5)
Pricing (output)
~$25 per 1M tokens

Supported modalities

Text · Image

Context window

1M (1,000,000 tokens)

Pricing

Input: ~$5 per 1M tokens (claude-opus-5)
Output: ~$25 per 1M tokens

Fast mode is higher; verify Anthropic pricing.

Availability

API: Yes
Chat UI: Yes
Open weights: No

Claude.ai and Anthropic API (claude-opus-5); also via major cloud partners. Computer use GA (computer_toolset_20260801) and browser use (browser_toolset_20260801) as of 2026-08-19. SynthID-Text watermarking applied globally from Aug 14 2026 (EU AI Act); C2PA on images/SVGs; detection API forthcoming.

Use cases

  • Long-document analysis and synthesis
  • High-stakes writing and policy drafting
  • Agentic coding and computer/browser-use workflows
  • Research assistants with tool use

Strengths

  • Strong agentic coding and verification loops
  • GA computer use + browser toolsets for UI automation
  • Strong safety / constitutional AI posture
  • 1M-token context for document-heavy work

Limitations

  • Closed weights
  • Below Claude Fable 5.1 on peak capability; higher cost than Sonnet/Haiku
  • Audio modality limited vs some peers

Related guides

Related benchmarks

Related research

Related GitHub

Related tools

Related rankings

Related comparisons

Companies

Explore more models

All models →